@terziyski Thanks for the info. The diagram shows 2 PCs accessing the router, and the router having 2 lans to a NAS. So I can see the 2 LANs to the NAS as getting to 2GB/s but why is this aggregation ? As simply using 2 LAN cables from the router to the NAS will do exactly the same.
The PCs on the picture only have a single LAN to the router, and the router only supports 1 GB/s LAN ports, so even if the PC LAN port supports 2.5GB/s, the PC can not access more than the 1GB/s LAN output on the router.
If there were 2 LAN ports on the PC (which I have), and 2 on the router, and I could connect my PCs 2 LAN ports to the router, then I could see how 2 GB/s could be available to the PC - if you were streaming 2 different files from the router.
OR if there was a 2GB/s LAN port on the router, and I could connect one of my 2.5GB/s LAN ports to it then I could also see the 2GB/s to the NAS as useful, as then my PC could handle >1GB/s on a single LAN, so eve naccessing the same stream/file would be beneficial.
So it seems aggregation means simply having the concept of a single 2GB/s ethernet container on the router, but I dont see any point to that, as you have to use 2 cables from the router to the NAS anyway both at 1 GB/s, and everything leaving the router is 1GB/s max, as the aggregation is not to any PCs.